Sunday, 26 September 2010

Did Papal Visit Signal an End to the English Reformation? I Pray So!

Edward Pentin writes the following post on the end of the English Reformation. I have believed for some time that the English Reformation is coming to an end as we see the shipwreck that Protestantism taken to its logical conclusion has on the Faith once delivered to the saints. I say that as a former Protestant who has come to see the importance of ecclesial communio that looks to the Successor of St Peter for hope and unity. The prior statement is in no way a personal attack to my Protestant friends (I still have family members I deeply love who are Protestants) but an academic response to what is happening before our eyes in Church history.

For the first time, a ruling English monarch allowed the Successor of Peter to address her Parliament, attend a liturgy in the church of her Coronation, and even to pray with her archbishop at the tomb of the Royal Family’s patron saint. Her government also hosted unprecedented formal bilateral talks with Holy See officials.

It was a kind of surrender, a giving up of the Reformation and all it had stood for in terms of rebellion against the papacy. But this shouldn't be seen as a defeat for the Crown; rather the opposite. It was as if the Queen had finally come to the realization that Rome was right after all, that the Catholic Church offers something which her subjects need – even “thirst for” in the words of Benedict – and which her own church and state are failing to provide....

Today that’s no longer quite the case. Some say that Anglicanism has run its course. The advent of the new Ordinariates and their expected long term popularity is a consequence of its decline (though leaving behind a distinct patrimony that still has much to offer the universal Church). Benedict XVI called the new structure for receiving large numbers of Anglicans into the Church a “prophetic gesture” during the visit, one that will restore “full ecclesial communion.”

A corner has therefore surely been turned and a new chapter of Christianity in Britain, and possibly globally, may be beginning.

Elizabeth I was the English sovereign who gave momentum to the English Reformation (what Chesterton called the “shipwreck of Christendom”) that would last half a millennium.

Elizabeth II may well go down in history as the monarch who – with the help of a Pope passionate about Christian unity – didn’t quite end it but has courageously helped draw it to a close.

This turn of events will produce much more fruit than we can possibly imagine. I believe that the Protestant Reformation is coming to its end and a realignment of the Church Catholic is now underway. As Anglicans prepare to come into the fold as Catholics and prayers and talks between East and West continue as radical secularism continues to try and suck the life-blood out of Western society, the Church will rise to the occasion and give the only hope that any of us have and that is the hope found in our Lord Jesus Christ united in one visible body.

10 comments:

Warren said...

For me, the Reformation ended when I converted 25 years ago.

I agree that a realignment is underway. People of goodwill are seeing that, without an authoritative interpreter, Holy Scripture can be made to say just about anything and justify just about anything. Holy Scripture, emptied of its meaning, is emptied of its authority. Why invest in a (protestant) religion that doesn't offer anything but a glorified social club promoting values hardly different than those of the contemporary culture of death?

This year in a local Anglican diocese a full third of the parishes are closing. There will likely be more closures in the new year once the review process is complete. Several diocesan ministries will be severely affected by cuts, diocesan offices are losing several paid staff, the college chaplain position is cut and more. The pews are emptying; financial support is drying up.

My Anglican acquaintances departing for other refuges claim what should be obvious to all - the Anglican Church of Canada has gone off the rails. Many are desperately clinging to their Anglican identity by joining continuing Anglican movements such as ANiC. Others are joining the Catholic Church. A steady trickle is building into a wave of converts who are not simply fleeing what is wrong with Anglicanism and mainstream protestantism. Those same people are leaving in order to gain the truth, the Gospel unvarnished. They discover that the Catholic Church is the Church Jesus founded and teaches without compromise what He taught. They discover that the Catholic Church is their home.

waterbrook said...

I think this is a rather unfortunate piece of writing sure to raise the heckles of many Anglicans..a far cry from the diplomatic statements of Pope Benedict.

Jeffrey Steel said...

Waterbrook, I have no idea what you are talking about. Why is it that academic dialogue and discussions about history and movements be critiqued without it becoming so personal for some people? Surely we can handle disagreement on this site. The HF didn't apologise for his statements or make qualifications to the nth degree. Reading the HF's entire visit and addresses shows that he was gracious but faithful in upholding the truth; that includes implementing the Apostolic Constitution he called for last year.

What is so unfortunate about stating the Reformation needing to come to an end?

waterbrook said...

Jeffrey, I didn't say that I would agree with those who would find such a view extremely difficult. Whilst I would love to see Roman Catholics and Anglicans in communion with one another I am very aware that in reality there are within the Anglican communion those who take pride in being reformed and manage to very publically warn against some Catholic teachings from the pulpit.Yes there have been some significant moves during the papal visit and I welcome them but how deeply a movement for change runs within the Church of England I'm unsure.

Anonymous said...

Hold on, I think Waterbrook was praising the pope, and mildly disagreeing with the tone of the Pentin piece. S'all. By the way, I think Mr Pentin is rather putting words into the mind/mouth of the monarch...

waterbrook said...

Thank you anonymous.

tuleesh said...

Dear Father Steel,
Who would've thought, even a few years ago, that the Pope, would've been invited to speak in the same place where St. Thomas More was sentenced to death...
G-d is seriously up to something.

Praise be Jesus and blessed be His Holy Name!

P.S. I found your blog and in a story about people who have "crossed the Tiber." A little while later my computer went on the fritz, and I lost all my links. But through inventive key word searches I found yours again. I'm glad I did because I wanted to see your take on our dear Papa Beni's pilgrimage to your great country. Thank you so much for your views and your fine blog

Stuart said...

There's another line you could take on this, which (one might argue) has more theological worth than Pentin's. It would run thus:

JP II's visit in 1982 was a real piece of progress for the Catholic Church both in Britain and worldwide: finally, the leader of the True Church could minister directly to his flock in these Isles. However, the B XVI visit represents a massive step backwards in the development of that Church: it was an acknowledgement of the post-Constantinian failure of Christianity, because it was a State Visit of the leader of one State to the leader of another. This drags the Catholic Church into the secular sphere in just the way it should currently be resisting, and opens it to all the ethical and doctrinal accusations which it would avoid if it undid the Constantinian move. It is the visit most likely to precipitate another Reformation within Catholicism.

There's *always* another side to the story...

E Pentin said...

Dear Father Jeffrey,

I stumbled across your excellent blog and was happy to see the article I wrote on the Holy Father's visit has provoked this interesting debate.

Like you, as a convert I have dear and close family and friends who are Anglicans and my intention was by no means to upset them (and they have not been). Rather the purpose was, as you rightly wrote, to make an academic point about the significance of the Pope's visit to Britain and the country's Christian history - the weight of which I don't think had been properly appreciated.

Stuart makes an interesting point but I believe it's a fallacious one. If the Reformation is to end - a process which I believe is happening - then these aspects of interstate relations need to be formally healed and reconciled. Only then can the Church take up her rightful place in British society, not as part of the Establishment or as part of a return to the Constantinian tradition, but as an important, accepted and respected voice in society, one that upholds human dignity and the common good, and is once again perceived as a viable instrument of salvation.

England's deepest cultural roots are Catholic, and it's from these roots that the country has given so much good to the world. In my opinion, the Pope's visit was a major step in reclaiming them, arguably at a time when the Catholic Church is most needed in England.

The Queen, I believe, recognizes this, even though, as I infer in my article, this is speculative and one cannot know for sure.

Anonymous said...

"England's deepest cultural roots are Catholic...". Ah, but for the Synod of Whitby.