I have begun to think about a talk I will be giving near the time of the Holy Father's visit in September. This invitation has allowed me to reflect on my decision to become a Catholic a little over a year ago now. So much has changed about my thinking this past year that it is difficult to believe how I thought at one time. I guess that is the nature of conversion. Conversion is to change one's direction completely from what it was before.I believe my time outside of communion with the Mother Church was not much more than seeking "internal agreements" with those I disagreed with about ecclesiology in order to feel as catholic as possible. Theologically, I understood that the Church was formed episcopally, but found myself functioning congregationally while out of unity with Peter. Simply assembling together in the name of Jesus, apart from any communion with the whole Church, could not be the act that institutionalises communio. Looking back now, I see that "functionally," I was living by the notion that the Church is established "from below" and hence any group could refer to themselves as "catholic" because the community established in this way holds the power ("keys") of the Church and hence the right of Eucharistic celebrations. I did not see this very clearly for a long time, but now living in communion this past year with the See of Peter has allowed me to come to terms with my thinking.
There are very serious ecclesial problems with the above way of thinking that some readers may also want to consider about the way we view the petrine ministry. Cardinal Ratzinger said in his book Called to Communion that
This approach [church from below view] inevitably destroys the public nature and all-embracing reconciliatory character of the Church, both of which are represented in the episcopal principle and result from the essence of the Eucharist. The Church becomes a group held together by her internal agreement, whereas her catholic dimension crumbles away. The Lord's word concerning the two or three who gather in his name must not be isolate; it is not a definitive and exhaustive statement of the whole of the Church's reality. The assembly, even the informal togetherness of prayer groups, has an important role in the Church. But as a constitutive principel of the Church, these things are not sufficient.Something to think about for those outside of communion with Peter.
3 comments:
I am, and hopefully by and through the grace of my saviour Jesus Christ, will remain a Catholic, until my death. However, and speaking as one 'below' (I have no desire to ever be anything other than below Him) that without the zeal of the Baptists and Pentecostals that I met in my youth, especially Billy Graham, who I have seen and heard three times at revival meetings, I would not, have had the emotional part of my senses ignited for Christ. Hot or cold, but not lukewarm remember! I feel alive at revival services, but they are generally Protestant. So, I say, thank God for Protestants! Golly, hope that doesn't make me a heretic?
Good point but to be fair the Orthodox have no central command but are not congregationalist or even Protestant.
I couldt agree more. I am about to be recieved in the Church in August. I cant tell you how much my thinking has had to change from a Reformed/Evangelical mindset to an Anglo-Catholic now Catholic.
Simply another world altogether.
Tiber swimmer
Post a Comment