Tuesday, 20 October 2009

CDF Document on the Holy Father's Personal Ordinariates

NOTE OF THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH ABOUT PERSONAL ORDINARIATES FOR ANGLICANS ENTERING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

With the preparation of an Apostolic Constitution, the Catholic Church is responding to the many requests that have been submitted to the Holy See from groups of Anglican clergy and faithful in different parts of the world who wish to enter into full visible communion.

In this Apostolic Constitution the Holy Father has introduced a canonical structure that provides for such corporate reunion by establishing Personal Ordinariates, which will allow former Anglicans to enter full communion with the Catholic Church while preserving elements of the distinctive Anglican spiritual and liturgical patrimony. Under the terms of the Apostolic Constitution, pastoral oversight and guidance will be provided for groups of former Anglicans through a Personal Ordinariate, whose Ordinary will usually be appointed from among former Anglican clergy.

The forthcoming Apostolic Constitution provides a reasonable and even necessary response to a world-wide phenomenon, by offering a single canonical model for the universal Church which is adaptable to various local situations and equitable to former Anglicans in its universal application. It provides for the ordination as Catholic priests of married former Anglican clergy. Historical and ecumenical reasons preclude the ordination of married men as bishops in both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. The Constitution therefore stipulates that the Ordinary can be either a priest or an unmarried bishop. The seminarians in the Ordinariate are to be prepared alongside other Catholic seminarians, though the Ordinariate may establish a house of formation to address the particular needs of formation in the Anglican patrimony. In this way, the Apostolic Constitution seeks to balance on the one hand the concern to preserve the worthy Anglican liturgical and spiritual patrimony and, on the other hand, the concern that these groups and their clergy will be integrated into the Catholic Church.

Cardinal William Levada, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which has prepared this provision, said: "We have been trying to meet the requests for full communion that have come to us from Anglicans in different parts of the world in recent years in a uniform and equitable way. With this proposal the Church wants to respond to the legitimate aspirations of these Anglican groups for full and visible unity with the Bishop of Rome, successor of St. Peter."

These Personal Ordinariates will be formed, as needed, in consultation with local Conferences of Bishops, and their structure will be similar in some ways to that of the Military Ordinariates which have been established in most countries to provide pastoral care for the members of the armed forces and their dependents throughout the world. "Those Anglicans who have approached the Holy See have made clear their desire for full, visible unity in the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. At the same time, they have told us of the importance of their Anglican traditions of spirituality and worship for their faith journey," Cardinal Levada said.
The provision of this new structure is consistent with the commitment to ecumenical dialogue, which continues to be a priority for the Catholic Church, particularly through the efforts of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity. "The initiative has come from a number of different groups of Anglicans," Cardinal Levada went on to say: "They have declared that they share the common Catholic faith as it is expressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and accept the Petrine ministry as something Christ willed for the Church. For them, the time has come to express this implicit unity in the visible form of full communion."

According to Levada: "It is the hope of the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, that the Anglican clergy and faithful who desire union with the Catholic Church will find in this canonical structure the opportunity to preserve those Anglican traditions precious to them and consistent with the Catholic faith. Insofar as these traditions express in a distinctive way the faith that is held in common, they are a gift to be shared in the wider Church. The unity of the Church does not require a uniformity that ignores cultural diversity, as the history of Christianity shows. Moreover, the many diverse traditions present in the Catholic Church today are all rooted in the principle articulated by St. Paul in his letter to the Ephesians: ‘There is one Lord, one faith, one baptism’ (4:5). Our communion is therefore strengthened by such legitimate diversity, and so we are happy that these men and women bring with them their particular contributions to our common life of faith."

Background information
Since the sixteenth century, when King Henry VIII declared the Church in England independent of Papal Authority, the Church of England has created its own doctrinal confessions, liturgical books, and pastoral practices, often incorporating ideas from the Reformation on the European continent. The expansion of the British Empire, together with Anglican missionary work, eventually gave rise to a world-wide Anglican Communion.

Throughout the more than 450 years of its history the question of the reunification of Anglicans and Catholics has never been far from mind. In the mid-nineteenth century the Oxford Movement (in England) saw a rekindling of interest in the Catholic aspects of Anglicanism. In the early twentieth century Cardinal Mercier of Belgium entered into well publicized conversations with Anglicans to explore the possibility of union with the Catholic Church under the banner of an Anglicanism "reunited but not absorbed".

At the Second Vatican Council hope for union was further nourished when the Decree on Ecumenism (n. 13), referring to communions separated from the Catholic Church at the time of the Reformation, stated that: "Among those in which Catholic traditions and institutions in part continue to exist, the Anglican Communion occupies a special place."

Since the Council, Anglican-Roman Catholic relations have created a much improved climate of mutual understanding and cooperation. The Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) produced a series of doctrinal statements over the years in the hope of creating the basis for full and visible unity. For many in both communions, the ARCIC statements provided a vehicle in which a common expression of faith could be recognized. It is in this framework that this new provision should be seen.

In the years since the Council, some Anglicans have abandoned the tradition of conferring Holy Orders only on men by calling women to the priesthood and the episcopacy. More recently, some segments of the Anglican Communion have departed from the common biblical teaching on human sexuality—already clearly stated in the ARCIC document "Life in Christ"—by the ordination of openly homosexual clergy and the blessing of homosexual partnerships. At the same time, as the Anglican Communion faces these new and difficult challenges, the Catholic Church remains fully committed to continuing ecumenical engagement with the Anglican Communion, particularly through the efforts of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity.

In the meantime, many individual Anglicans have entered into full communion with the Catholic Church. Sometimes there have been groups of Anglicans who have entered while preserving some "corporate" structure. Examples of this include, the Anglican diocese of Amritsar in India, and some individual parishes in the United States which maintained an Anglican identity when entering the Catholic Church under a "pastoral provision" adopted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and approved by Pope John Paul II in 1982. In these cases, the Catholic Church has frequently dispensed from the requirement of celibacy to allow those married Anglican clergy who desire to continue ministerial service as Catholic priests to be ordained in the Catholic Church.

In the light of these developments, the Personal Ordinariates established by the Apostolic Constitution can be seen as another step toward the realization the aspiration for full, visible union in the Church of Christ, one of the principal goals of the ecumenical movement.

12 comments:

lukacs said...

So, had you stayed an FiF-affiliated priest in the C of E, would you be on a faster track to the Roman priesthood?

Jeffrey Steel said...

Lukacs,

I don't know that I would be on a faster track and that was not what factored into my decision at all being that I left with my wife and our six children with absolutely no concessions or promises whatsoever. We took a leap of obedient faith and I am still very happy about the decision I made in what I believe was obedient love and conversion to Christ and a conversion to obedience to the See of Peter. These two conversions must take place in every individual in order to respond positively to the Apostolic Constitution.

I am thankful for the Holy Father's generosity and his understanding of Anglicans and I celebrate all movements of reunion with the rock from which we former Anglicans and present were hewn. I am not an Anglican but a Catholic and my vocation for the future is presently in discernment and being offered up in prayer. I hope you would pray for me and for my family! Thanks!

Tim said...

A gift indeed!! I am so thankful for the Holy Father's generosity. You and your family will be the intention of my rosary tonight Jeffrey

voces said...

Does anybody know if this will reverse Apostolicae Curae?

Maurice said...

No no no. Of course it won't reverse Appostolicae Curae! These Anglicans will have to convert to Catholicism. They'll have to be ordained as Catholic priests. They'll be treated the same as all former Anglicans who've come over to Rome. The difference will be in the rites that they use (ie Anglican-style liturgies suitably altered by Rome to be theologically consonant with Catholic doctrine). None of them will be guarantedd ordination either. A huge leap of faith will be necessary. Nothing has really changed.

Fr. J. said...

Maurice,

Nothing has changed? I don't agree. Anglican clergy will be serving under bishops that understand them and fully appreciate what they bring. It is not always the Latin bishop's fault that he knows so little, but it is a fact just the same.

This could be a very significant development as it means that the Catholic Church is recognizing the value and the spirituality of an at least fairly protestant body. This is something new and important. Its long term implications for roman liturgy are not without import either.

Anonymous said...

Since most English ACs already use Roman liturgical forms just what exactly is going to distinguish their litugy as being distinctively 'Anglican' - since presently they avoid being distinctively Anglican at all costs! It appears that having married priests, their own 'ordinary', and perhaps the occasional Choral Evensong is about it.

It would be highly ironic if they had to take up distinctive Anglican liturgical forms in order to justify their presence in the ordinariate :-)

Jeffrey Steel said...

Anonymous, I think there is some truth in what you say with particular emphasis on English ACs. I have been asked privately and in person if I am going to take advantage of this move by the Vatican and my response is that 1) I am a Catholic now and not an Anglican. 2) I don't want to be an Anglican united to the Catholic Church. 3) I want to be Catholic and I converted on the basis of a conversion to Christ and the Church under the authority of the See of Peter. 4) If ever I am to become a priest in the Catholic Church, I want to be formed fully as a Catholic priest not an Anglican one. 5) I don't want to use an Anglican rite, I want to use what the Church prescribes as the rite that is used by all (As an Anglican priest I only prayed from the Roman rite and the Breviary). 6) I don't think converts should look for special favours just the gracious hospitality and space for vocational discernment leaving the decision of one's vocation in the hands of those who have always made the decisions in the normal way.

Anonymous said...

Jeff,

I see and appreciate your true humility and your sense of complete submission to Christ. You stated the following:

"...I don't think converts should look for special favours just the gracious hospitality and space for vocational discernment leaving the decision of one's vocation in the hands of those who have always made the decisions in the normal way."

This statement is something that shows what I believe can only happen in a Church with the Hierarchical structure of the RCC (Perhaps in EOC as well). IOW, authority in the RCC allows for complete submission to Christ. there is no "Ecclesial Community" which allows for 'complete' submission to Christ. The individual christian, forever and always, while also seeing themselves as a christian, has a duty to the "Primacy" of personal conscience. While it is true that one is obligated to obey their conscience; to give ones conscience the absolute right of private judgement in all matters of faith is a false teaching and a false reality. This type of Primacy of Conscience which is foundational to all non- (Roman ) Catholic ecclesial communities necessarily means that one can not have knowledge of fully submitting to Christ. This is especially true since these same communities teach that no man is infallible. So, it seems to me that full submission (and obedience) to Christ is realized first in this world through a structure that the RCC has. This, of course, is the gift of the Papacy and Magisterium. It's as if God knew fallible,sinful humans required such a structure-LOL.

Maurice said...

Fr J
Fr J
You couldn't be more wrong. As a FAC myself, I felt that my 'new' (RC) bishop was a humble, generous holy man who wanted not only to understand me but to celebrate the gifts I brought from my previous ministry. Ask any RC bp or priest and they'll tell you what a blessing FACs are to the RCC. Truly, nothing's changed. I am glad I came over when I did for I'd hate to be marked for ever as an Anglican Use RC. Now, I just fit in with everyone else as a regular member of the diocesan presbyterate. I'm PP of a large and thriving parish. The majority of my parishioners don't know I'm a FAC and I certainly don't tell them. As I say, nothing's changed.

Clare said...

"It is not always the Latin bishop's fault that he knows so little, but it is a fact just the same.

"This could be a very significant development as it means that the Catholic Church is recognizing the value and the spirituality of an at least fairly protestant body... Its long term implications for roman liturgy are not without import either."

The above comment strikes me as quite patronizing.

1. "Latin bishop knows so little" --what do you mean? Do you mean a Catholic bishop (the only real bishops in any case) of the Latin Rite, as opposed to the Byzantine Rite, for example? I assure you, these men know a lot. With how many bishops have you had a discussion of the Faith?

2. Far from "recognizing the value and the spirituality of an at least fairly protestant body" the Church is rather allowing -- at the request of Anglicans -- the use of liturgical forms that are consistent with Catholicism -- as with the other rites of the Church.

3. What implications could there be for the "roman [sic] liturgy"? What is the "roman liturgy? There are two forms of the Mass -- the ordinary and the extraordinary (often referred to as the Tridentine Rite or Latin Mass). The Eastern Rites have individual liturgical forms, but all are of course consistent with the teachings of Holy Mother Church.

Remember: there is no Roman Catholic Church -- there is the Catholic Church alone -- one, holy, Catholic and apostolic.

Peter Porter said...

I am enormously impressed by Jeffrey Steele's humility and integrity in what he writes of his own conversion and hopes for the future. That, to me, is a sign of a real conversion, and a true turning towards Truth. And I entirely agree with Maurice's testimony of what he has found, received, and given to the Catholic Church. That, too, has the mark of genuine authenticity. Both dispositions are a gift from God and a sign of grace.

As for the consequences of what increasingly seems to me to be the amazing response by the Holy Father to the needs of Anglicans driven out of their parent body, they remain a mystery yet to be revealed. I have no idea how this is to be effected but, frankly, I would, as a convert, no more wish to cling to aspects of Anglicanism that I had repudiated while still a member of the Church of England, than be catapulted to the moon. Like Jeffrey and Maurice I am simply happy to be a Catholic, and that's that.

I cannot believe that this is going to be simple or acceptable to residual Anglo-Catholics in the British setting. It is likelier to work more successfully in the Commonwealth and the United States. Here we have an Established Church with all the legal problems attached. Anglo-Catholicism can only survive subsidized within the Established Church as far as stipends, churches and vicarages are concerned. Those magnificent c19- and early-c20-Anglo-Catholic churches, once one of the glories of the movement, are likely to become white elephants that nobody will be able to use or maintain properly. Anglo-Catholicism in this country is attached so strongly to bricks and mortar that I cannot see it surviving beyond it.

Still less do I see the majority of Anglo-Catholic clergymen nourished liturgically on a Roman diet changing it for plainer fare. The cultural sacrifice is likely to be enormous and may well contribute to the undoing of the Holy Father's generosity. To Forward in Faith it will, I suggest, have come more as a cold draft of reality than a beam of Mediterranean warmth. And by that I mean a dose of reality that makes daydreams and paper schemes look like the fantasies they are. It will be interesting to see what emerges from the week-end's meeting.