Friday, 13 March 2009

What a Shepherd! What a Pope!

I pray every day for the Holy Father because he is God's man for our times. I find more in common with him, and his way of leading and guiding the flock of Jesus as a result of his uncompromisingly yet gracious ways, that I can only wonder why we should not want to be united to him. I pray that some of his own examples that he displays for us would be manifested in my own Christian life. What a Christian man! His letter to the bishops is refreshing and full of godly wisdom. It is a shame that so many have publicly mistreated him and spoken such ill words about the Holy Father. I hope that everyone will hear him and his reflections on Galatians. None of this praise is to even begin to be thankful for his strong desire for unity in the Church and his willingness to suffer the cost of making it happen. He is Jesus' servant! Let those who condemn him put out their pursuits for unity and generosity so we can compare. My daily offices and the intention of Mass is offered for him today. God bless Pope Benedict XVI! Read his entire letter here.

Certainly, for some time now, and once again on this specific occasion, we have heard from some representatives of that community many unpleasant things – arrogance and presumptuousness, an obsession with one-sided positions, etc. Yet to tell the truth, I must add that I have also received a number of touching testimonials of gratitude which clearly showed an openness of heart. But should not the great Church also allow herself to be generous in the knowledge of her great breadth, in the knowledge of the promise made to her? Should not we, as good educators, also be capable of overlooking various faults and making every effort to open up broader vistas? And should we not admit that some unpleasant things have also emerged in Church circles? At times one gets the impression that our society needs to have at least one group to which no tolerance may be shown; which one can easily attack and hate. And should someone dare to approach them – in this case the Pope – he too loses any right to tolerance; he too can be treated hatefully, without misgiving or restraint.

Dear Brothers, during the days when I first had the idea of writing this letter, by chance, during a visit to the Roman Seminary, I had to interpret and comment on Galatians 5:13-15. I was surprised at the directness with which that passage speaks to us about the present moment: "Do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love be servants of one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word: ‘You shall love your neighbour as yourself’. But if you bite and devour one another, take heed that you are not consumed by one another." I am always tempted to see these words as another of the rhetorical excesses which we occasionally find in Saint Paul. To some extent that may also be the case. But sad to say, this "biting and devouring" also exists in the Church today, as expression of a poorly understood freedom. Should we be surprised that we too are no better than the Galatians? That at the very least we are threatened by the same temptations? That we must always learn anew the proper use of freedom? And that we must always learn anew the supreme priority, which is love? The day I spoke about this at the Major Seminary, the feast of Our Lady of Trust was being celebrated in Rome. And so it is: Mary teaches us trust. She leads us to her Son, in whom all of us can put our trust. He will be our guide – even in turbulent times. And so I would like to offer heartfelt thanks to all the many Bishops who have lately offered me touching tokens of trust and affection, and above all assured me of their prayers. My thanks also go to all the faithful who in these days have given me testimony of their constant fidelity to the Successor of Saint Peter. May the Lord protect all of us and guide our steps along the way of peace. This is the prayer that rises up instinctively from my heart at the beginning of this Lent, a liturgical season particularly suited to interior purification, one which invites all of us to look with renewed hope to the light which awaits us at Easter.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

" I find more in common with him, and his way of leading and guiding the flock of Jesus as a result of his uncompromisingly yet gracious ways, that I can only wonder why we should not want to be united to him."

Father,
I am a Roman Catholic. I love our Pope. I am curious if you could feel this way about a Pope if he was not so gracious and perhaps was outwardly sinful in his ways-eg. some of the Popes prior to the Reformation?

In Christ's Love,
Pat

Fr Jeffrey Steel SSC said...

Dear Pat,

Thank you for your note. Of course this post is about this particular pope and there would of course be problems with any pope who defied the teaching of the Church or abused his office as a means for selfish or evil ends. He would condemn himself if he did. Pope Benedict is simply an upstanding Christian man who fears no man but his love for Jesus and the Church is what motivates his every word and action. That is to be praised by any Christian I think.

Canon Jerome Lloyd OSJV said...

I second that emotion! Benedict is a gift from God to The [whole] Church... if only "they" could all see it.

rev'd up said...

Unfortunately, all I notice in the Pope's communique is an absolute lack of charity. He has praise for Jews and scolds for Catholics. If he were to check his Bible he would notice that the Jews are dead in tresspasses and sins (today's (Friday 13) Triditine liturgy is an excellent example - he should try reading S. Ambrose's sermon). The new "shoah dogma" is repugnant to Scripture, Christian tradition and right reason. The most horrendous crime ever commited was commited by Jews when they killed their Messiah, Jesus Christ. Until the Pope "gets with the program" he shows nothing but contempt for the souls of Jews. He is creating a double mind in Christians and ignoring the reality of Jewish perfidy.

Whatever the historical detail of the shoah be, it is impossible to ascertain when there is a proscription on it being intelligently considered. In his communique, the Pope has joined his voice with the shrill cacophony of the anti-intellectuals that would imprison everyone in their anti-christ agenda. The Pope has sown division in the Bride of Christ and false security in Jews.

I wish I could share your enthusiasm, but instead I am depressed.

Anonymous said...

Fr. Steele,
Thanks for your kind response. My thought about having communion with the Pope was meant to look at an element of Faith according to the RCC, ie, The Petrine Ministry as a gift from God regardless of the person holding the position. IOW, is the Primacy of the Bishop of Rome what the RCC claims it to be?

Pat

Anonymous said...

Rev'd up,
Simply put, you are wrong because the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church is infallible!

Pat

Fr Jeffrey Steel SSC said...

Pat, I would say of course it is but the one who holds it objectively must incarnate it subjectively or he is unfaithful to the Petrine office. Right?

Anonymous said...

Fr. Steel,
Lest we talk past each other let me just ask if you believe in the Charism of Papal Infallibility as taught by the RCC?

Pat

Fr Jeffrey Steel SSC said...

That's not a problem.

Fr Jeffrey Steel SSC said...

I should qualify as properly understood and taught; not the errors and mistaken notions of the gift given.

Fr Jeffrey Steel SSC said...

In addition, what must be clear is that papal infallibility does not mean impeccability or the authority to declare heresy.

rev'd up said...

Sorry, Pat, the "Roman Catholic Church" is merely fallibly infallible. Study the word "magisterium" and you'll find that modern notions of spiritual authority within God's Church are not those of the historic Catholic Church. There was a paradigm shift at V2 (predicated by numerous events) which render RC chest thumping about as impressive as an ape on the telly - only funnier.

Wm Riley said...

Well rev'd up I'm afraid if the Catholic Church in union with the See of Peter isn't infallible, then our Lord didn't rise from the dead. If Peter didn't speak through Leo as defined by Chalcedon then the whole authority of all of the the Ecumenical Councils folds up and with it the Faith. It is as it is rev'd up, perhaps it's time for you to crack the books - I'd start with the Fathers.

Pax.

Will Riley

rev'd up said...

"Well rev'd up I'm afraid if the Catholic Church in union with the See of Peter isn't infallible, then our Lord didn't rise from the dead."

Rather bizarre reasoning?

Nevertheless, please don't change the terms of the argument I never said, "the Catholic Church in union with the See of Peter isn't infallible," as a matter of fact, I absolutely believe that it is. This is the historic use of the term "magisterium." The post-concilliar RCC wants to create the impression that they and they alone are the magisterium. This was Pat's implied point; and it is absolute nonsense.

Wm Riley said...

rev'd up,

Thanks for carrying your argument on the force of your own assertion, unfortunately I don't accept your authority to determine truth so you'll need to marshal some facts and argument if you want to do anything other then act as a theological gadfly. Tell me where is the Church today? I'll tell you it is the Catholic Church composed of the people united to their bishop who is in turn united to the See of Rome. Who speaks with definitive authority? The Magisterium of the Catholic Church (see above). I assume you are going to trot out some tired old pseudo-Protestant Anglican version of the branch theory - let's have at it.

Pax,

Will Riley