
I found this post below a portion of an interesting piece by Dr. Liccione. It is worthy of serious discussion and thought. He titles it
Sacramental Contradiction. I particularly point out his touching on a worldview of moral theology that runs throughout his critique. A good dose of old fashioned moral theology might do wonders for Anglican seminarians and future priests as well as those of us presently serving. One may differ on the style or tone but let's look at the substance of his argument theologically and objectively. Read it all at the blog
Sacramentum Vitae.
Most Catholics, most Christians for that matter, have values and attitudes that do not cohere with the faith they profess. Of course they are unwilling to admit as much; if they were, they'd be motivated to change. Having emerged from the immigrant ghetto and joined the "mainstream" over the last fifty or sixty years, American Catholics are as guilty of incoherence as anybody, and more than many. For many of us, worldly values and attitudes are now prejudices taken for granted. We judge the Church by the values of our "set" in the world, not vice-versa. Usually, such values and attitudes have never been exposed to informed, objective examination themselves. That's easy to explain, but impossible to justify. People don't like examining and critically evaluating their prejudices. That would mean thinking, as opposed to quite a number of more entertaining activities; worse, it would mean admitting that what we like being may not be what we ought to be. That is why the discipline of Lent is so vital. By denying ourselves things we like, and using the space created thereby to love more sacrificially, we get out of our comfort zones and admit that we need repentance—not just for a season and ritually, but every day of the year.
And so I feel no sense of moral superiority when I savage Ruth Gledhill and her set. She and they are merely one illustration, and not the most important one, of a universal human tendency that Lent exists to help root out. By observing our Lenten rituals with the humble yet acute awareness that we are all wretched sinners, we might open ourselves to the grace of being taught just what our most insidious sins are. Being taught as much takes grace because the sins in question are more deeply rooted than we think. But the truly serious Christians will often seem a bit dotty for wanting to root out of themselves the kinds of sins most people are happy to live with. The truly serious Christians willingly embrace the sacramental contradiction of dying to self in order to live more abundantly. In other words, they live the Paschal Mystery. That's the kind of dottiness we need more of.
2 comments:
Hear hear!
Thank you Father for this!
Well, for me the obvious point is that some people (actually, the vast majority of people) who are Christians accept some bits of Christian belief but not others. This is not 'cognitive dissonance' or hypocrisy, it is a judgement. Naturally, there are some church leaders who don't like this very much. On the other hand, there is very little they can actually do. On the whole, considering the dreadful excesses perpetrated by church people of all ranks in the past, this is a good thing.
Post a Comment