Most Reverend Fathers in God,
We write as bishops, priests and deacons of the Provinces of Canterbury and York, who have sought, by God’s grace, in our various ministries, to celebrate the Sacraments and preach the Word faithfully; to form, nurture and catechise new Christians; to pastor the people of God entrusted to our care; and, through the work of our dioceses, parishes and institutions, to build up the Kingdom and to further God’s mission to the world in this land.
Our theological convictions, grounded in obedience to Scripture and Tradition, and attentive to the need to discern the mind of the whole Church Catholic in matters touching on Faith and Order, lead us to doubt the sacramental ministry of those women ordained to the priesthood by the Church of England since 1994. Having said that, we have engaged with the life of the Church of England in a myriad of ways, nationally and locally, and have made sincere efforts to work courteously and carefully with those with whom we disagree. In the midst of this disagreement over Holy Order, we have, we believe, borne particular witness to the cause of Christian unity, and to the imperative of Our Lord’s command that ‘all may be one.’
We include those who have given many years service to the Church in the ordained ministry, and others who are very newly ordained. We believe that we demonstrate the vitality of the tradition which we represent and which has formed us in our discipleship and ministry – a tradition which, we believe, constitutes an essential and invaluable part of the life and character of the Church of England, without which it would be deeply impoverished.
Since the ordination of women to the priesthood began in 1994, we have been able to exercise our ministry in the context of the solemn assurances given at that time that our understanding of Holy Order was one entirely consonant with the faith and practice of the Church of England, and secure in the knowledge that those assurances were embodied in the legislation passed in 1993, and in the Act of Synod which followed that legislation.
That legislation, together with the Act, has been the framework which has allowed us to continue to live and work in a church which has taken the decision to allow women to be ordained, but which has also made room for us, and honoured our beliefs and convictions. We have been further encouraged and affirmed by the Resolution of the Lambeth Conference 1998, endorsed by the General Synod in July 2006, that “those who dissent from as well as those who assent to the ordination of women to the priesthood and episcopate are both loyal Anglicans.”
We believe that, should the Church of England move to the ordination of women to the episcopate, our ability to continue to minister in the church to which we have been called will depend on provision being made to allow us to do so with the same theological integrity which we have been able to hold since 1994. We recognise that, much as we might hope things to be otherwise, the Church of England is set upon the path of ordaining women as bishops. We will strive to honour their calling as ministers of the Gospel, and to respect the offices which they will hold, despite our profound reservations about the Church of England’s decision to ordain and consecrate them. We do not look for ‘protection’ from the ministry of ordained women. Rather, we ask that our theological convictions continue to be accorded that respect which was promised fifteen years ago.
We believe that priests must be able to look to bishops about whose ministry they can be assured; and that bishops in turn must be able to carry out their ministry in a way consonant with the traditional exercise of Episcopal office. Only a structural solution to the new problems which will inevitably be created for the Church by the ordination of women to the episcopate can, we believe, allow us to flourish and to contribute to the life of the whole Church as we believe the Spirit continues to call us to do.
It is with sadness that we conclude that, should the Church of England indeed go ahead with the ordination of women to the episcopate, without at the same time making provision which offers us real ecclesial integrity and security, many of us will be thinking very hard about the way ahead. We will inevitably be asking whether we can, in conscience, continue to minister as bishops, priests and deacons in the Church of England which has been our home. We do not write this in a spirit of making threats or throwing down gauntlets. Rather, we believe that the time has come to make our concerns plain, so that the possible consequences of a failure to make provision which allows us to flourish and to grow are clear. Your Graces will know that the cost of such a choice would be both spiritual and material.
We know that all members of the Church of England and of the General Synod in particular, will be looking to you for wisdom, guidance and leadership in this matter. We urge you, as our Fathers in God, to lead the whole Church in making generous and coherent provision for us. This will not only allow us to continue to play our part in that mission, under God, to which we are all committed, but also ensure that the Church of England continues to encompass, in her polity, an understanding of Holy Orders consonant with that of the great Churches of East and West with whom we share the historic episcopate.
We assure you of our prayers at this time.
Sign here.
16 comments:
This reads like you've rationalized a compromise with your conscience once and are saying "don't make me do it again". Why would you expect a different outcome the next time? If you're serious about following your conscience, you ought to recognize the rationalization, make the hard decision and move on.
Anon,
Why don't you leave your name? This is a process of discernment and pastoral care. Not individualism.
Figured the comment stood on its own. Did it strike a nerve? Sometimes it good that happens. You seem to be dabbling with the RC....Is it time to get off the fence and jump?
Well anon, it's no secret that I have many sympathies with the RCC in so many areas. I have devoted the last 5 years of my life to strong ecumenical pursuits in the area of Eucharistic sacrifce. So, no nerve, just a chord was struck!
May God bless you as you discern His will for your life and for the life of compatriots.
In Christ,
+Fr Gregory Jensen
Ecumenism implies possibility of reunion. There is no possibility of reunion with Rome. It doesn't matter if you're an Orthodox or "Anglican". The Pope is the Vicar of Christ on earth. The Roman Church is the Catholic Church. And that is all that matters.
The 'augustinian successor' makes an astonishing and dismissive assertion.
The Orthodox remain a very good way to go Jeff for all troubled by these declensions in the CofE. Indeed, perhaps western rite churches will begin to spring up throughout England.
The devil will feed your indecision with false hopes and false fears, because indecision wastes time and keeps you from doing what you should be doing.
Amen, Anonymous!
Watch it Fr Jeffrey, you're going to find yourself celebrating mass in a "travel trailer" (your terminology).
Tracy H
Bottom line is: will the Church of Rome agree to take on as priest even assiduously card-carrying Anglican Romanist with wife and 6 kids?
Serious question: answered in the affirmative by the Blessed Basil only because English RCs have been greatly influenced (as many honestly admit) by the superior humanity of ... English Anglicanism.
Course, makes one wonder if maybe Anglicanism isn't the superior church ...
Rome doesn't receive any individual with a promise for ordination so the question is moot. At this point in my life I am continuing to faithfully feed the flock and minister to Christ's people the best I can under the circumstances we find ourselves in at the present. I am not being forced out of the CofE (yet!) so for now, I go on ministering in love and faith. If or when I am ever forced to make a decision for the good of my spirituality and that of my family, I will be sure to communicate that decision on this site. Until such a time, I serve in the integrity of the Catholic faith passed on to the Church of England to which I have been ordained a priest to serve.
How is that answer?
By the way, I wasn't on anymore last evening as my wife returned from a weekend at Blackpool for a football tournament with Joshua. We watched a movie after the kids went to bed! So, no bluff called!
You say that you serve in "the integrity of the Catholic faith passed on to the Church of England...". Isn't that what's at issue? I think that integrity was already compromised when the Church of England broke with Rome damaging the unity of the Mystical Body of Christ. Aren't your current concerns with ordination of women just another compromise with the integrity of the Sacred Tradition of the Catholic faith?
Of course the ordination of women are a another compromise with the Sacrament of Holy Orders and the many other issues where the Anglican Church breaks with the teachings of the Catholic Tradition. But, if you read journals like the Tablet and other such periodicals, you will see that there are a lot of RC's who believe the same as liberal Anglicans on these issues. Does that change the Catholic Faith? No. Neither does it change the Catholic Faith for me as I serve in a parish in the C of E. The Church in the West is in a huge mess - one that I did not create. I simply live with the mess and look to be faithful.
For one thing, I think Anglo-papalists (which can only really exist in the CofE due to our history and "structure") live and work looking to reuniting with the Holy See of Rome. That is unashamedly my hopes for the Catholic Anglicans and Orthodox of the East. I want more than anything for the Church in the East and the West to be united against the false religions of this world and to proclaim the absolute Lordship of Jesus.
There is one consideration that we might also entertain. Like Deborah in the book of Judges and God's prophesied judgment on Israel in Isaiah 3, we might consider that since men are refusing to make the sacrifice to take up Holy Orders this may be God's way of "waking us up" to the unhealthiness of the Church. If the men won't do it, God may use women who will. That is not an embrace or an acceptance of WO, it is simply to say, priests need to call the men in the Church to be the spiritual leaders of their homes and families as well as leaders in the Church. That is not popular language in our egalitarian culture, but let's be honest, things are not working at the present. The labourers are few!
So, until God makes it clear that the "game" is over, I must remain faithful to my calling as a priest to teach and promote the Catholic Faith where I am. One day, it very well could come down to a difficult decision for many of us. On that day, God will give me the grace to do the right thing along with hundreds of thousands of others.
Fr. Jeffrey,
you may be right that there are "liberals" in the Catholic Church. But articles in their favourite magazine do not represent authority. You must surely know that had that "gay wedding" happened in a Catholic church this weekend, all concerned would have been ex-communicated by now. By contrast, there is simply no authority in the CofE.
How can we live with this? I go to a modern catholic Mass on Sundays in an Anglican church, and try to pretend that it is representative of the wider church to which I belong. But it isn't. Month in, month out, I read stories about the rest of the CofE, and it's always the same story - liberal. I fear my membership of the CofE is a serious self-delusion.
Alan I agree that the Tablet is not the Catholic Church's teaching. Sad that many in the C of E within the Catholic Tradition think it is. Some in my tradition reduce the Catholic faith to love of the Eucharist and Mary. Far from being Catholic!
Post a Comment